CATEGORY

Passive Components

Beroe LiVE.Ai™

AI-powered self-service platform for all your sourcing decision needs across 1,600+ categories llike Passive Components.

Market Data, Sourcing & Supplier Intelligence, and Price & Cost Benchmarking.

Schedule a Demo

Passive Components Market Monitoring Dashboard

Supply Demand

Understand the correlation between costs, margins, and prices impacting your category on a real time basis on Beroe LiVE.Ai™

Passive Components Industry Benchmarks

Savings Achieved

(in %)

The average annual savings achieved in Passive Components category is 12.00%

Payment Terms

(in days)

The industry average payment terms in Passive Components category for the current quarter is 60.0 days

Compare your category performance against peers and industry benchmarks across 20+ parameters on Beroe LiVE.Ai™

Category Strategy and Flexibility

Engagement Model

Supply Assurance

Sourcing Process

Supplier Type

Pricing Model

Contract Length

SLAs/KPIs

Lead Time

Supplier Diversity

Targeted Savings

Risk Mitigation

Financial Risk

Sanctions

AMEs

Geopolitical Risk

Cost Optimization

Price per Unit Competitiveness

Specification Leanness

Minimum Order Quality

Payment Terms

Inventory Control

Meet Abi

The World’s first Digital Market Analyst

    Schedule a Demo
    Meet Abi

    The World’s first Digital Market Analyst

    Abi, the AI-powered digital assistant brings together data, insights, and intelligence for faster answers to sourcing questions

    Passive Components Suppliers

    6,438 
    Total Suppliers
    197
    Diverse Suppliers
    95
    Normalized Supplier Rating
    Passive Components Supplier

    Find the right-fit passive components supplier for your specific business needs and filter by location, industry, category, revenue, certifications, and more on Beroe LiVE.Ai™.

    Sample Supplier
    Company
    ABB Ltd
    Location
    Jackson, Mississipi
    Duns number
    3862211
    D&B SER Rating
    dnb logo

    Up to 3 months

    1 9
    1
    Low Risk High Risk

    The Supplier Evaluation Risk (SER) Rating is Dun & Bradstreet’s proprietary scoring system used to assess the probability that a business will seek relief from creditors or cease operations within the next 12 months. SER ratings range from 1 to 9, with 9 indicating the highest risk of failure. We’ve prepared an infographic to help business owners better understand what influences their SER Rating.

    Moody`s ESG Solution
    ESG Profile
    Company and Sector Performance
    58
    100
    Robust (1)
    ESG Perfomance (/100)
    Environment
    59
    Social
    54
    Governance
    62
    6 Domains Performance (/100)
    Business behaviour
    58
    Human rights
    58
    Community Environment
    37
    Corporate governance
    67
    Human resources
    54
    Security Scorecard
    97
    Threat indicators
    A
    100
    Network Security
    Detecting insecure network settings
    A
    100
    Hacker Chatter
    Monitoring hacker sites for chatter about your company
    A
    100
    DNS Health
    Detecting DNS insecure configuration and vulnerabilities
    B
    88
    Application Security
    Detecting common website application vulnerbilities
    A
    100
    Endpoint Security
    Detecting unprotected enpoints or entry points of user tools, such as desktops, laptops mobile devices, and virtual desktops
    A
    100
    Cubic Score
    Proprietary algorithms checking for implementation of common security best practices
    A
    100
    Patching Cadence
    Out of date company assets which may contain vulnerabilities of risk
    A
    100
    Social Engineering
    Measuring company awareness to a social engineering or phising attack
    A
    100
    IP Reputation
    Detecting suspecious activity, such as malware or spam, within your company network
    A
    100
    Information Leak
    Potentially confidential company information which may have been inadvertently leaked
    Industry Comparison
    global.abb
    Industry average
    Adverse Media Appearances
    Environmental Issues
    0
    Workforce Health Safety Issues
    0
    Product Service Issues
    7
    Human Rights Issues
    0
    Production Supply Chain Issues
    1
    Environmental Non Compliance Flags
    8
    Corruption Issues
    11
    Regulatory Non Compliance Flags
    27
    Fraud Issues
    7
    Labor Health Safety Flags
    8
    Regulatory Issues
    9
    Workforce Disputes
    2
    Sanctions
    0
    esg energy transition
    59
    Discrimination Workforce Rights Issues
    6
    esg controversies critical severity
    No

    Passive Components market report transcript

    Passive Components Global Market Outlook:

    Market Overview
    Passive Components : $30.5 billion (2020E), expected to grow at a CAGR of 6 percent CAGR from 2019 to 2023.

    Global Market Outlook

    • Global Maturity: High
    • Global Capacity: Sufficient Supply (2020–2023)

    Porter's Analysis on Passive Components (Electronics)

    Supplier Power

    • Component providers have medium to low power, based on the industry they cater to
    • For fragmented market in the consumer and devices segment, component suppliers have lower power
    • For consolidated, industrial/automotive segments, component suppliers have medium power
      Competition
    • The market is surrounded by a large number of suppliers, still it is dominated by a small number of key players. This results in gaining supplier
      power

    Barriers to New Entrants

    • Infrastructure
    • The foremost barrier for a new entrant is resources and capital cost required to start a plant. It is in addition to labor, transportation, and warehousing
      Brand Differentiation
    • Though there is a potential for a new entrant to compete head-to-head with key players, brand differentiation strengthens the new entrant only to a limited extent, especially for semi conductors
      Switching Cost
    • Customers find it challenging to switch from one supplier to a new entrant by changing the entire design

    Intensity of Rivalry

    • Product Differentiation and Contractual Terms
    • Intense competition in the industry, with few differentiated service offerings are the main factors for high industry rivalry
    • Flexible contractual terms are being used to attract customers
    • The pressure remains with all the tier-2 players in the industry
    • Exit barriers for big players are also high, due to high cost of entry into the market

    Threat of Substitutes

               Switching Cost

    • For semi-conductors, high switching cost is involved that makes it difficult for substitutes to draw customers away from key players
    • For passives and interconnects, the switching cost is low, as there could be very similar passive
      component or interconnect that can substitute the existing product
      Performance to Price Ratio
    • The switching cost differs for different electronic components, the low performance to price ratio of substitutes exerts a weak force in the industry environment

    Buyer Power

    • Total Spend
    • With the ever-increasing buyer spend on electronic components, the buyer’s ability to bargain and obtain value-added services is high Contracts
    • For semi-conductors, supplier alliances are formed in a long-term basis, so buyer power is generally high during long-term over short-term
    • There is a mild backward integration risk, due to large entry barriers. For passives & interconnects, they generally focus on procurement from distributors rather than suppliers for commoditized products