CATEGORY
Gum turpentine
Beroe LiVE.Ai™
AI-powered self-service platform for all your sourcing decision needs across 1,600+ categories llike Gum turpentine.
Market Data, Sourcing & Supplier Intelligence, and Price & Cost Benchmarking.
Gum turpentine Market Monitoring Dashboard
Understand the correlation between costs, margins, and prices impacting your category on a real time basis on Beroe LiVE.Ai™
Gum turpentine Industry Benchmarks
Savings Achieved
(in %)
The average annual savings achieved in Gum turpentine category is 5.30%
Payment Terms
(in days)
The industry average payment terms in Gum turpentine category for the current quarter is 75.6 days
Compare your category performance against peers and industry benchmarks across 20+ parameters on Beroe LiVE.Ai™
Category Strategy and Flexibility
Engagement Model
Supply Assurance
Sourcing Process
Supplier Type
Pricing Model
Contract Length
SLAs/KPIs
Lead Time
Supplier Diversity
Targeted Savings
Risk Mitigation
Financial Risk
Sanctions
AMEs
Geopolitical Risk
Cost Optimization
Price per Unit Competitiveness
Specification Leanness
Minimum Order Quality
Payment Terms
Inventory Control
The World’s first Digital Market Analyst
Abi, the AI-powered digital assistant brings together data, insights, and intelligence for faster answers to sourcing questions
Gum turpentine Suppliers

Find the right-fit gum turpentine supplier for your specific business needs and filter by location, industry, category, revenue, certifications, and more on Beroe LiVE.Ai™.



Use the Gum turpentine market, supplier and price information for category strategy creation and Quaterly Business Reviews (QRBs)
Gum turpentine market report transcript
Gum Turpentine Global Market Outlook:
Market Size (2019): $29.5 billion (expected to grow at a CAGR of 6–7 percent from 2019 to 2022)
Cost Drivers: Turpentine, raw material cost (43 percent)
Key Market Drivers (2019):
• Rapidly rising income and increased per capita spending on personal grooming
• Rising demand for natural fragrances, due to health impact
Key Market Constraints (2019):
• High initial and R&D costs in the Flavors & Fragrance (F&F) business
• Weather fluctuations
• Labor shortage
Porter's Analysis on Gum Turpentine
Supplier Power
- Suppliers to fragrance houses have low power, as this industry is fragmented
- Increase in regulation cost, coupled with erratic supplies of natural ingredients, involves a huge cost in mechanizing and accumulating inventory, which will eventually reduce the profit margins of fragrance houses
Barriers to New Entrants
- Technical capabilities and access to raw materials are the key risks for new entrants in the fragrance industry
- Complying several government regulations on safety and sustainability also prevent new entrants to sustain in the market in the long term
Intensity of Rivalry
- The fragrance industry is highly consolidated with the top 10 fragrance houses, which hold around 80 percent of the total supply
- High competition, coupled with maturing markets, is intensifying the rivalry
- Suppliers are attempting to achieve competitive advantage through technological innovation
Threat of Substitutes
- Switching cost will be high, as most fragrances are formulae patented by FMCG clients
- As the personal care fragrance industry is highly dominated by synthetic ingredients, threat of substitution from natural products is low
Buyer Power
- Consumer companies have to completely depend on unique fragrances manufactured by fragrance houses
- Quality and sustained supplies remain the key factors, which reduces switching among suppliers