CATEGORY

Face Masks

Beroe LiVE.Ai™

AI-powered self-service platform for all your sourcing decision needs across 1,600+ categories llike Face Masks.

Market Data, Sourcing & Supplier Intelligence, and Price & Cost Benchmarking.

Schedule a Demo

Face Masks Market Monitoring Dashboard


Supply Demand

Understand the correlation between costs, margins, and prices impacting your category on a real time basis on Beroe LiVE.Ai™

Face Masks Industry Benchmarks


Savings Achieved

(in %)

The average annual savings achieved in Face Masks category is 18.50%

Payment Terms

(in days)

The industry average payment terms in Face Masks category for the current quarter is 55.6 days

Compare your category performance against peers and industry benchmarks across 20+ parameters on Beroe LiVE.Ai™

Category Strategy and Flexibility

Engagement Model

Supply Assurance

Sourcing Process

Supplier Type

Pricing Model

Contract Length

SLAs/KPIs

Lead Time

Supplier Diversity

Targeted Savings

Risk Mitigation

Financial Risk

Sanctions

AMEs

Geopolitical Risk

Cost Optimization

Price per Unit Competitiveness

Specification Leanness

Minimum Order Quality

Payment Terms

Inventory Control

Meet Abi

The World’s first Digital Market Analyst

    Schedule a Demo
    Meet Abi

    The World’s first Digital Market Analyst

    Abi, the AI-powered digital assistant brings together data, insights, and intelligence for faster answers to sourcing questions

    Face Masks Suppliers


    13,746
    Total Suppliers
    778
    Diverse Suppliers
    56
    Normalized Supplier Rating
    Face Masks Supplier

    Find the right-fit face masks supplier for your specific business needs and filter by location, industry, category, revenue, certifications, and more on Beroe LiVE.Ai™.

    Sample Supplier
    Company
    MERCK KGaA
    Location
    Jackson, Mississipi
    Duns number
    3862211

    D&B SER Rating

    dnb logo

    Up to 3 months

    1 9
    1
    Low Risk High Risk

    The Supplier Evaluation Risk (SER) Rating is Dun & Bradstreet’s proprietary scoring system used to assess the probability that a business will seek relief from creditors or cease operations within the next 12 months. SER ratings range from 1 to 9, with 9 indicating the highest risk of failure. We’ve prepared an infographic to help business owners better understand what influences their SER Rating.

    Moody`s ESG Solution
    ESG Profile

    Company and Sector Performance
    54

    100
    Robust (1)
    ESG Perfomance (/100)
    Environment
    50
    Social
    64
    Governance
    44
    6 Domains Performance (/100)
    Business behaviour
    55
    Human rights
    71
    Community Environment
    63
    Corporate governance
    43
    Human resources
    57
    Security Scorecard
    79

    Threat indicators
    C
    77
    Network Security
    Detecting insecure network settings
    A
    100
    Hacker Chatter
    Monitoring hacker sites for chatter about your company
    B
    80
    DNS Health
    Detecting DNS insecure configuration and vulnerabilities
    F
    49
    Application Security
    Detecting common website application vulnerbilities
    A
    100
    Endpoint Security
    Detecting unprotected enpoints or entry points of user tools, such as desktops, laptops mobile devices, and virtual desktops
    A
    100
    Cubic Score
    Proprietary algorithms checking for implementation of common security best practices
    B
    89
    Patching Cadence
    Out of date company assets which may contain vulnerabilities of risk
    A
    100
    Social Engineering
    Measuring company awareness to a social engineering or phising attack
    A
    100
    IP Reputation
    Detecting suspecious activity, such as malware or spam, within your company network
    A
    100
    Information Leak
    Potentially confidential company information which may have been inadvertently leaked

    Industry Comparison
    merckgroup.com
    Industry average
    Adverse Media Appearances
    Environmental Issues
    0
    Workforce Health Safety Issues
    0
    Product Service Issues
    9
    Human Rights Issues
    1
    Production Supply Chain Issues
    0
    Environmental Non Compliance Flags
    9
    Corruption Issues
    0
    Regulatory Non Compliance Flags
    11
    Fraud Issues
    3
    Labor Health Safety Flags
    2
    Regulatory Issues
    8
    Workforce Disputes
    1
    Sanctions
    0
    esg energy transition
    53
    Discrimination Workforce Rights Issues
    0
    esg controversies critical severity
    No

    Face Masks Market Intelligence

    global market outlook

      • The global face mask market was valued at $10.2 Billion in 2021 and witness a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21% during the forecast period (2021-2025E)
      • The face mask market is majorly driven by the health care professionals that used these products daily for attending patients or perform surgeries
      • Major suppliers such as Honeywell and 3M are continuously expanding their production capacity to cater to the increasing demand.
      • APAC countries (specifically China) are major suppliers of face masks to the global market owing to the presence of raw materials and a cost advantage due to low-cost labor

    Face Masks market report transcript


    Face Masks Global Market Outlook:

    MARKET OVERVIEW
    Global market size – 9.5 Bn (2020)
    Expected to grow at a CAGR of 26 percent

    KPIs

    • Price
    • Usage of Approved Raw Material
    • Regulatory Certifications
    • Lead time

    Porter's Analysis on Face Masks

    Supplier Power

    • The supplier market for face masks is highly fragmented, with over 100 suppliers present globally with most of them supplying face masks
    • There are various types of face masks available with the suppliers such as Respirators (N95, N99), Surgical masks (2 ply, 3ply), etc.
    • Hence, the supplier power varies from low to medium for face mask suppliers

    Barriers to New Entrants

    • Significant initial capital investment for setting up of factories and machineries coupled with regulatory Requirements such as NIOSH, CE, EN 14683 and ISO 13485 capabilities are key for production of face masks
    • Recent outbreak of coronavirus opens up high potential opportunities for new players to enter the market due to the huge demand.

    Intensity of Rivalry

    • The supplier base is highly fragmented with more players entering the market due to the recent virus outbreak.
    • Manufacturers are also continuously expanding capacity by introducing additional production lines to cater to the demand.
    • The above trends leave the intensity of the rivalry as high among suppliers

    Threat of Substitutes

    • Face shields are transparent physical barriers and are emerging as an alternative to regular face masks.
    • However, CDC does not recommend use of face shields as a substitute as they do not serve as an efficient barrier to reduce transmission of droplets.
    • Therefore, the threat of substitutes is low for face masks.

    Buyer Power

    • Gap in supply-demand of face masks along with absence of better alternatives have resulted in less buyer bargaining power in the medical industry
    • Over the years, the PPE manufacturing have been outsourced to APAC, specifically China, leading to lower bargaining power with buyers during global supply disruptions due to COVID