Environmental Regulations in China Impact on Chemical Industry


By: RajeshKumar S | Saranya Anbu | Gaurav Pandey -- Senior Research Analysts

17 November, 2019

Listen to this article



Introduction to Chinese environmental regulations

Over the last decade, the rapid pace of development in the Chinese chemical industry was faster in China compared to other countries. This development has its pros, such as a rise in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), employment, and export. However, it has seriously deteriorated the environmental standards, such as air and water quality. Due to a strong manufacturing growth, China has the most polluted cities in the world. Smog-related issues, heavy air pollution, and river contamination have got both domestic and global attention in the last two years.
With the situation worsening every winter, China has ratified its Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) efforts to curb the pollution. Previously, though the EPA rules were in place, the fines associated with non-compliance were minimal; and hence, suppliers preferred paying fines, if caught, rather than adhering to standards. This environmental overrun has happened for almost 20 years, now, leading China to face the consequences.
Previously, these cleanup endeavors were brief, and they were primarily event based. For example, during 2008 Beijing Olympics, 2010 Shanghai World Expo, and 2012 Hangzhou G-20 Economic Summit, such inspections and pollution crackdowns were witnessed.

Timeline of EPA inspection events in China


Image courtesy: ICIS

Impact caused so far, due to environmental regulations

1. Increased lead time

  • Lead times for most of the chemicals have increased significantly in the last one year. Especially, importers in Europe and North America have expressed their concern recently
For instance, supply of food additives to Europe has been impacted to a larger extent. Importers in Europe are facing trouble with huge lead times and uncertainty of receiving the material even after the lead time

2. Price increase

  • The most impactful issue with the Chinese environmental regulations is the increase in price. Prices have gone up exponentially, especially for those materials for which China is a critical supplier
  • Metals and plastic prices have also increased. Zinc prices have increased by more than 10% in just one month
  • Price of packaging material, such as carton box, has increased significantly, leaving all industries with increased ex-factory prices
For example, absence of optimal stock levels has pushed up the price of silicone rubber. Prices have increased by more than 40 percent in Q1 2018

3. Impact over China’s mixed paper packaging

  • China’s ban on mixed paper imports, revised contamination standard, and cutting down of Old Corrugated Container (OCC) import licenses, at the back of environmental concerns, are causing serious damages to the global recycling industry. During H2 2017, Chinese domestic OCC prices have been skyrocketing against significantly decreasing import prices. Packaging buyers in China are thus facing harder times in acquiring corrugated boxes, owing to higher prices
  •  Adding to this import ban, China reduced the contamination percentage in imported recovered paper (which also includes OCC) from 1.5% to 0.3%, and later, proposed revised contamination standard to 0.5%, though recycling organizations had urged it to increase the cap to 1%
  •  Impact on packaging buyers based in China: With the first batch of OCC licenses provided in December 2017 and similar approvals expected in the forthcoming months, Chinese buyers might be happy, as OCC market congestion will ease. However, during a peak demand, there is possibility of a tight supply, as mills may struggle to meet the demand
  •  Potential solution to the current situation for paper packaging:

I) There are few converters, who are importing containerboard from other Asian countries (India, Vietnam, etc.), to avoid loss. Buyers are also witnessed engaging in a similar practice to avoid high prices and further hikes.
II) Major end use of pulp in China was tissue, paper grades, and hygiene products. However, with import restrictions on recovered paper, the demand from the packaging sector is increasing significantly.

4. Scale and sector to be most impacted

  • From the trends witnessed, focus on the consolidation of the surplus capacity in the industry is affirmative. As a result, the Chinese government wants to shutdown the small to medium-scale industry, which are not complying with laws and whose economies of scale will not be able to support the cost associated with new regulations


  • As of now, textiles, rubber, leather, chemicals, carbon, metal, coating, plastic, dying, painting, and printing processes are the most impacted industries. This trend is expected to continue to other polluting industries as well 

5. Developed provinces are the most impacted

  •  Over the last decade, China is increasingly spending much on the infrastructure of North and Eastern provinces, which has aided the rapid industrialization of the regions. With pollution levels haunting these developed regions, the return on investment has been impacted, resulting in acute labor and financial crisis 


Motive beyond environment

The environmental control activities actually began in 2015, but did not have any significant impact until 2016. In 2017, around 80,000 factories had been charged with breaching emission levels, with an estimate that 40% of China’s total manufacturing capacity temporarily shutdown, with factory closures lasting two to three weeks. Some of the plant closures, especially small-scale plants operating in oversupplied markets, which were struggling to maintain good economies of scale, were permanent. Hence, it is evident that China is using its environmental campaign to solve multiple problems at once.

Problem #1: Oversupplied market, leading to stagnant low prices

Due to China’s aggressive economic growth policy in the past decade, there are a number of state-owned and small to medium-scale companies, operating in the chemicals industry, leading to an excess supply in some of the chemicals. This has led to a mix of low and high-quality products, with consecutive years of low prices. One such example is the surfactants industry in China. 

Case 1: Surfactants Industry in China
Supply–demand gap of the global surfactant market for linear alkyl benzene/linear alkyl benzene sulfonate is about 1.1 Million Metric Ton (MMT) in 2016, and as per industry reports, there is a huge supply–demand gap of about 5.3 MMT in ethoxylates, as of 2016, of which about 3.5 MMT is contributed by Asia alone.
Surfactant is the second largest downstream market for Ethylene Oxide (EO). China’s EO capacity has grown from 0.4 MMT in 2005 to 4.23 MMT in 2016, leading to a capacity expansion of domestic players. In 2014 and 2015, nine domestic suppliers started Ethoxylation plants for the production of 730,000 MT of surfactants and eight suppliers started or completed construction of sulphonation plants, with a total capacity of over 550,000 MT.
China has about 500 domestic players in the surfactants market, who hold a slightly greater share compared to 30 foreign surfactant manufacturers. This leads to a huge difference in material quality and pricing between foreign and domestic players. For example, in the cationic surfactants segment, the average price from foreign suppliers is 1.7 times the average price from domestic suppliers.
Outlook: Consolidation of capacity by eliminating suppliers, who do not comply to environmental regulations

Case 2: Tissue industry consolidation


Problem # 2: China’s debt crisis

China’s debt has increased significantly over the past decade, mainly due to large-scale investment in manufacturing and real estate, post 2008, as China used debt to improve domestic growth to compensate for the global financial crisis. This credit boom led to a number of new companies, especially in the chemicals sector (1,171 state-owned enterprises for the manufacturing of raw chemical material and chemical products), leading to overcapacity with factories, producing an average of 20% more than the market demand in 2016.
China’s total debt amounted to 257.1% of its GDP in 2016, and the total credit growth averaged at a rate of about 20% Year-on-Year (Y-o-Y) between 2009 and 2015. The rate at which the debt is increasing Y-o-Y is more concerning than the amount of debt, especially the corporate debt. It is estimated that two-thirds of corporate debt is due to China's state-owned enterprises, many of which are unprofitable and inefficient.

Credit rating downgraded
In May 2017, Moody’s has downgraded China’s sovereign debt, rating from Aa3 to A1
Also, in September 2017, Standard & Poor’s has downgraded China’s credit, rating from AA- to A+, declaring “a prolonged period of strong credit growth has increased China’s economic and financial risks”.


China’s insolvency cases increased by 54% from 2015 to 2016, as stringent reforms led state-owned companies making losses Y-o-Y with high level of debts to go bankrupt.

China’s corporate sector’s Capital Output Ratio (ICOR) has increased more than threefold from 2009 to 2017. Hence, China is trying to reduce the overcapacity and consolidate the industry to control the spend. During 2017, China cuts 128 MMT of its total coal capacity and 42.4 MMT of its total steel capacity, reaching 85% of its annual reduction targets.
During 2016, China’s State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission has identified around 345 companies, which are most likely to be shutdown in the next two years.

How is the chemical industry reacting?

Chinese chemical producers, especially small to medium scale, are left with less options, while large-scale companies are finding ways to defend their supply chain with minimum disruption. Below are some of the key trends observed in the response of stringent EPA actions over the past two years:
1. Relocating within China
a. The small to medium-scale players have to move to industrial parks, as directed by inspection authorities. However, the access to capital for relocation is limited for small to medium-scale players. Many factory owners are toward their retirement age, and they would rather consider scaling back/exiting this industry

Case: Sinopec Baling Petrochemical, which is one of the largest state-owned enterprise, is planning on relocating its 300,000 MT caprolactam plant from the existing urban area at Yueyang in Hunan province to an industry park in the same city. This trend from larger corporates gives a clear indication that the government’s push for a clean environment is certain

2. Expanding supply footprint outside China
a. Companies sourcing raw material from different locations have started to enter into contracts with countries outside China, wherever the volume is available (without much deviation in pricing)

We witness a trend, where companies are looking for supply partners within Asia, except China, especially in countries, such as Taiwan, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, India, and Bangladesh

3. Getting audited
a. Companies having certification, like ISO 14001, are less likely to face any impact, due to EPA regulations. However, the company will face an impact, if the supply chain partners, such as raw material supplier and packaging partners, are not complaint:
       i. Case: A ceramics consumer in the UK is facing supply disruption from its supplier in Zibo (Shandong province), as the ceramic factory is closed. Though, the ceramic industry is not a polluting industry, it involves certain paint and treatment processes, provided by tier-II and III suppliers, who may not comply with these laws

4. Reengineering
a. Reengineering activities, such as altering the plant/production process to reduce effluents and air pollutants discharge, have been the most sought approach to mitigate the risk of impact
b. Uncertainty over EPA directions: It is observed that directives from EPA authorities have been differing from case-to-case. For instance, a company operating in an oversupplied market, such as dyes, and a company operating under niche categories, such as organic pharma excipients, get different incentives and directives
c. Case: A tartaric acid producer, who used heavy pollutants, like coal-fired boiler, was instructed to replace it with gas boiler. Post installation, the company cleared off the regulations. This company was given incentives, in terms of time, in order to complete the replacement, whereas this is not the case with other companies using coal as a fuel

Steps to ensure supply continuity, amidst environmental regulations


Assess the risk associated with nature of product sourced

Hazardous and polluting nature of the material should be thoroughly evaluated, in order to understand the level of regulatory risk. Production process involving heavy pollutants, such as coal, sulfur, and a few other chemicals, is at high risk.

Evaluate the supply chain and identify if there are any suppliers in the upstream/downstream with potential regulatory risk

Even if the direct material is not subjected to risk of regulatory actions, it is highly possible that a disruption may come from a tier-I or II feedstock, as evident from the recent cases. China has announced that it would completely ban the import of waste plastic, effective from January 1, 2019, as a part of the government's initiative to improve the environment of the country. Events like these would impact both the upstream and downstream risks associated with a commodity.

Around 270,000 companies are identified as taxpayers for the new environmental tax (green tax), and it is expected to increase.

Assess the risk associated with supplier's provincial location within China

Supplier location within China has become increasingly crucial in supplier evaluation process. Environmental regulations are different from province-to-province and are highly possible for a supplier, being placed in a high risk province.
Cost of taxation and penalty involved with non-compliance to EPA standards vary across different provinces. Part of authority to determine tax and penalty is vested with the provincial authorities, which might significantly impact the procurement cost.

Check for environmental certificates obtained by the supplier

Audit certificates from third-party agencies, such as ISO 14001, might mitigate the risk of supply disruption/high cost of compliance. Few producers, who are inspected and approved by the Chinese EPA enforcement authority, or suppliers, who have done their Environmental Impact Assessment, are also safe to engage.
Companies with such audit processes in place, such as Shanghai-based BASF Advanced Chemicals Co., have been levied only with a minimal new environmental quarterly tax.

BASF China paid a net of around CNY 8,800 ($1,401) for the tax, after a deduction of nearly CNY 600, as its pollution was lower than the national standards.

Assess the financial health of the supplier and scale of operation

As discussed about the looming debt crisis of China, it has become increasingly important to monitor the financial stability of the supplier. A small to medium-scale chemical producer, without EPA standards, operating in a surplus capacity market, with weak financials, has a higher probability of closure/suspension.

China wants to let-go and move up the ladder!

The policy changes and the government actions clearly indicate that China wants to clean up the manufacturing mess that has been created over the last decade. The economic fundamentals and overcapacity have clearly paved the path ahead for China. The country is willing to let-go the polluting and non-value-adding manufacturing industry capacity to other regions. Even if China tries to hold the current manufacturing capacity, it will be a burden in the next five years for industry profitability and looming debt crisis. Hence, actions taken so far as a part of environmental compliance are also aimed at restructuring various industries to have appropriate supply balance and step-up the industry standards.

BASF China paid a net of around CNY 8,800 ($1,401) for the tax, after a deduction of nearly CNY 600, as its pollution was lower than the national standards.


Part 1: Provincial data of plants impacted in China
Hubei to relocate/reengineer 144 chemical plants before 2025 and shut 11 plants.







Sichuan province to close nine chemical plants and relocate 37 plants. 



Heilongjiang province will close 14 chemical plants and relocate another five.


Part 2: China’s Environment Protection Tax Guidelines


Part 3: Chemical-wise impact on trade and investment






https://www.ft.com/content/e22dd988-3ed9-11e7-9d56-25f963e998b2 https://www.moodys.com/credit-ratings/China-Government-of-credit-rating-599085https://www.wsj.com/articles/s-p-downgrades-china-s-credit-rating-1505985995


American Red Cross CPO will talk about the Art of Stakeholder Management on Aug 4