Engineering the blast: Innovation, safety, and sustainability in modern mining explosives

Executive Summary

Mining blasting is increasingly a precision, data-driven discipline integrating chemistry, digital engineering, safety, and environmental stewardship. This white paper reviews the evolution from ANFO and bulk emulsions to electronic and wireless initiation, AI-enabled blast design, and lower-impact formulations. Evidence from field studies, mine-site cases, supplier disclosures, and industry validation shows that no single technology is universally superior: performance depends on geology, water, temperature, geochemistry, and downstream mine-to-mill requirements. Value comes from matching the right explosive and initiation system with rigorous design, monitoring, and sustainability controls.

Introduction: Why the cheapest explosive rarely delivers the cheapest blast

Rock blasting influences costs well beyond the blast itself. Fragmentation quality affects loading, hauling, crushing, milling, equipment wear, and secondary blasting, while poor control can create flyrock, vibration, air overpressure, and dust. Against this backdrop, manufacturers are reformulating products, extending initiation systems into wireless architectures, and embedding AI and remote sensing into blast design. Regulators are simultaneously tightening requirements for vibration, air-blast, flyrock, and community protection. [36]

Explosive types and selection criteria

Surface and underground mines use a focused range of products including ANFO, bulk and site-mixed emulsions, water-gel/slurry explosives, and specialized dynamites. Selection is governed by ground and water conditions, safety requirements, performance, and cost. ANFO remains attractive in dry ground because of its low cost and strong gas-driven heaving action, while emulsions offer higher density, water resistance, and detonation velocity, making them better suited to wet, reactive, or difficult ground. [1] [36]

Table 1. Principal explosive types used in underground mining, their water resistance, typical application, and relative cost-efficiency.

ANFO vs. emulsion: Why there’s no universal best buy

A 115-blast controlled study at an Indian open-cast coal mine illustrates why selection must remain site-specific. In dry conditions, ANFO achieved a better powder factor (3.27 m3/kg versus 2.00 m3/kg for site-mixed emulsion), finer D80 fragmentation, and lower peak particle velocity. The same study emphasized that emulsion remains preferable or necessary in wet, unstable, or fire-prone conditions. [36]

Ammonium nitrate: The cost driver every buyer should track

Industry validation from co-author Laone Lalah Motshwarapitse, based on operational experience across Botswana and South Africa, identifies ammonium nitrate as the most significant driver of bulk explosives pricing. This aligns with its role as the primary oxidizing component in ANFO and most bulk emulsions. Product quality, density, porosity, and storage conditions remain important because they influence both explosive performance and safe handling. [33]

Performance fundamentals: Reading the specs before you buy

Density and velocity of detonation (VOD) remain key field measures: higher-VOD emulsions favor strong shattering, while lower-VOD ANFO relies more on sustained gas pressure. In-hole VOD monitoring can also flag loading or borehole-condition issues. [36]

Initiation systems: Where wireless pays its way

Electronic detonators provide programmable millisecond timing that improves fragmentation control, vibration management, and misfire traceability. Wireless initiation removes physical downlines and surface wiring, enabling pre-charging and remote firing without re-entering hazardous voids. At Gold Fields’ St Ives mine, wireless blasting across 32 stopes and 69 blasts eliminated about 330 meters of development; by February 2026, more than 500,000 wireless primers had been fired globally. [6] [37]

Digital, AI, and drone tools: Verifying what each blast delivers

Drone photogrammetry and AI are moving blast design from experience-led practice toward a measured, iterative workflow. Pre-blast imagery can support 3D bench modeling and burden assessment, while predictive tools estimate muckpile shape, throw, and fragmentation. Post-blast drone analysis measures fragmentation and helps reconcile predicted and actual outcomes. Field studies indicate that this approach can reduce manual bias, limit personnel exposure to hazardous areas, and create auditable monitoring records. Energy-tailoring systems further allow explosive energy to be adjusted to ground conditions while using a common mobile manufacturing platform. [12] [27] [36]

Safety and regulation: How compliance shapes supply

Co-author industry validation also indicates that regulatory, permitting, and dangerous-goods requirements have a highly significant influence on explosives availability and operational planning in Southern Africa. Regulatory frameworks increasingly require site-specific limits, pre-blast assessment, and continuous monitoring of vibration, air-blast, and flyrock. Electronic initiation and monitoring networks support compliance by providing accurate timing and auditable blast records. Hot and reactive ground requires additional controls, including site-specific testing, safe sleep-time limits, and inhibited emulsion formulations where appropriate. [11] [14] Supply-chain and safety considerations are also encouraging alternatives to legacy hazardous inputs. TNT- and PETN-free booster technologies demonstrate how reformulation can reduce handling and logistics risks while supporting local manufacturing and supply resilience. [20]

Sustainability: The lower-impact options entering the supply base

Sustainability innovation is occurring across both initiation systems and explosive chemistry. Lead-free detonators are replacing lead-based primary and delay compositions, while hydrogen-peroxide-based emulsions offer a nitrate-free pathway intended to reduce nitrate leaching and NOx emissions. Recycled-content approaches are also emerging: one African manufacturer uses up to 90% recycled used engine oil in the fuel phase of its emulsions. Mine-scale evidence from Ukraine has associated increased use of engineered emulsion explosives with lower measured carbon monoxide and nitrogen-oxide impacts around mine ventilation shafts. [17] [18] [19] [21] [31] [35]

Economics: Judging explosives on total value, not unit price

The economic case for advanced blasting depends on total value rather than explosive price alone. According to co-author Laone Lalah Motshwarapitse, bulk mining explosives prices have generally increased by approximately 5-10% in recent periods, while limited spare production capacity constrains supply flexibility in Southern Africa. Finer and more consistent fragmentation can reduce load-and-haul time, crusher energy, equipment wear, and secondary blasting. Although site-mixed emulsions and wireless systems carry premiums over conventional alternatives, these costs can be offset where they reduce development, re-entry time, or downstream processing requirements. [35] [36] [37]

Case studies: Three sites, three different right answers

Three operating cases illustrate the importance of context. The Indian coal study found ANFO outperforming site-mixed emulsion on powder factor, fragmentation, and vibration under dry conditions. At St Ives, wireless pre-charging reduced development requirements and enabled improved ore recovery in complex stopes. In Ukrainian iron-ore mining, long-term adoption of engineered emulsion explosives was associated with both operating-cost reductions and improved environmental indicators. Together, the cases show that value comes from matching technology to site conditions rather than applying a single hierarchy of explosive products. [34] [35] [36] [37]

Outlook: What buyers should plan for

Industry validation suggests measured near-term growth rather than rapid acceleration. Based on conditions in Botswana and South Africa, co-author Laone Lalah Motshwarapitse expects mining explosives demand to grow modestly over the next twelve months, with copper mining among the strongest sources of incremental consumption. Broader industry trends point to continued adoption of wireless initiation, AI-assisted and drone-verified design, nitrate-free and recycled-content chemistries, tighter monitoring requirements, and greater localization of explosives manufacturing. [6]

Treat explosive selection as an ongoing sourcing decision

The findings are strengthened by practical validation from co-author Laone Lalah Motshwarapitse, whose experience across Botswana and South African mining operations supports the paper’s observations on ammonium nitrate economics, regulatory compliance, supply availability, recent price movement, and copper-led demand growth.

Mining explosives are evolving through the systems built around established blasting chemistry: more precise initiation, stronger digital measurement, tighter safety and environmental controls, and gradual replacement of hazardous legacy inputs. For mining organizations, explosive selection should therefore be treated as a continuous engineering and procurement decision that considers geology, water, reactive-ground risk, regulation, mine-to-mill economics, and sustainability together. The central challenge remains unchanged: matching the right chemistry and initiation architecture to the conditions of each blast.

References

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of co-author Laone Motshwarapitse for providing industry validation and practical insights based on mining operations in Botswana and South Africa. His expertise helped validate the market observations and outlook presented throughout this paper.

Industry and trade publications (compiled source material)

[1] MiningDoc. “What types of explosives are used in underground mining and why?” MiningDoc.tech, 25 June 2025. https://www.miningdoc.tech/question/what-types-of-explosives-are-used-in-underground-mining-and-why/

[2] Orica. “Celebrating 25 years of EBS.” Orica Resource Hub, 20 October 2025. https://www.orica.com/en/resource-hub/news/2025/celebrating-25-years-of-ebs

[3] Orica. “Orica’s future in initiation and electronic blasting systems.” Orica Resource Hub, 22 October 2025. https://www.orica.com/en/resource-hub/news/2024/oricas-future-in-initiation-and-electronic-blasting-systems

[4] Orica. “Orica announces the launch of i-kon III Steel.” Orica Resource Hub, 22 October 2025. https://www.orica.com/en/resource-hub/news/2024/orica-announces-the-launch-of-i-kon-iii-steel

[5] Williams, R. and Saieh, F. “Demystifying Electronic Blasting System (EBS) Dynamic Pressure Resistance Claims.” Orica Resource Hub, 26 November 2025. https://www.orica.com/en/resource-hub/news/2025/demystifying-electronic-blasting-system-ebs-dynamic-pressure-resistance-claims

[6] Orica. “WebGen™ wireless blasting technology surpasses 500,000 primers fired globally.” Orica Resource Hub, 18 February 2026. https://www.orica.com/en/resource-hub/news/2026/oricas-webgen-wireless-blasting-technology-primers-fired-globally-record

[7] African Mining Market. “Technology and best practice raise safety bar for explosives.” 10 June 2025. https://africanminingmarket.com/technology-and-best-practice-raise-safety-bar-for-explosives/22389/

[8] African Mining Market. “BME AXXIST™ technology facilitates complex pit design change.” 2025. https://africanminingmarket.com/bme-axxis-technology-facilitates-complex-pit-design-change/23190/

[9] African Mining Market. “Advanced blasting improves safety and provides cost savings.” 2025. https://africanminingmarket.com/advanced-blasting-improves-safety-and-provides-cost-savings/24261/

[10] Tunnicliffe, A. “Smarter and safer: explosives enter a new age.” Mining Technology, 17 July 2025. https://www.mining-technology.com/features/smarter-and-safer-explosives-enter-a-new-age/

[11] African Mining Market. “BME advances safer blasting in hot and reactive ground conditions.” 2025. https://africanminingmarket.com/bme-advances-safer-blasting-in-hot-and-reactive-ground-conditions/26233/

[12] Roebeck, T. “Digital blasting solutions a focus for manufacturer.” Mining Weekly, 13 June 2025. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/digital-blasting-solutions-a-focus-for-manufacturer-2025-06-13

[13] Nkomfe, L. “Explosives supplier embeds presence on continent.” Mining Weekly, 15 August 2025. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/explosives-supplier-embeds-presence-on-continent-2025-08-15

[14] Ramdass, N. “New code tightens blasting standards.” Mining Weekly, 17 October 2025. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/new-code-tightens-blasting-standards-2025-10-01

[15] Mining Weekly. “Innovative blasting solutions for modern mining.” 17 October 2025. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/innovative-blasting-solutions-for-modern-mining-2025-10-01

[16] Parker, D. “BME emulsion tech reinforces commitment to sustainable blasting practices.” Mining Weekly, 22 October 2025. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/bme-emulsion-tech-reinforces-commitment-to-sustainable-blasting-practices-2025-10-22

[17] Parker, D. “South Africa set to trial nitrate-free hydrogen peroxide-based explosive tech soon.” Mining Weekly, 22 October 2025. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/south-africa-set-to-trial-nitrate-free-hydrogen-peroxide-based-explosive-tech-soon-2025-10-22

[18] Slater, D. “Hydrogen peroxide emulsions rolled out to SADC markets.” Mining Weekly, 24 October 2025. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/hydrogen-peroxide-emulsions-rolled-out-to-sadc-markets-2025-10-24

[19] Mining Weekly. “BME nears 100% used-oil explosives breakthrough.” 24 October 2025. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/bme-nears-100-used-oil-explosives-breakthrough-2025-10-24

[20] Mining Weekly. “AECI unveils TNT-free booster technology.” 10 November 2025. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/aeci-unveils-tnt-free-booster-technology-2025-11-10

[21] Mining Weekly. “Greener blasts to help firms save time, money.” 28 November 2025. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/greener-blasts-to-help-firms-save-time-money-2025-11-28

[22] Mining Weekly. “Mali takes 51% stake in China-backed local explosives venture.” 26 January 2026. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/mali-takes-51-stake-in-china-backed-local-explosives-venture-2026-01-26

[23] Mining Weekly. “Explosives maker eyes Canada expansion with production complex.” 11 February 2026. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/explosives-maker-eyes-canada-expansion-with-production-complex-2026-02-11

[24] Mining Weekly. “Blasting solution meets Zambia’s complex geology demands.” 8 May 2026. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/blasting-solution-meets-zambias-complex-geology-demands-2026-05-08

[25] Mining Weekly. “Omnia delivers strong performance in challenging period.” 8 June 2026. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/omnia-delivers-strong-performance-in-challenging-period-2026-06-08

[26] Mining Weekly. “Modular emulsion plants benefit remote mines.” 10 July 2026. https://www.miningweekly.com/article/modular-emulsion-plants-benefit-remote-mines-2026-07-10

[27] Rigby, G. “Optimising explosive efficiency with Orica’s 4D™ technologies and decarbonization.” Orica Resource Hub, 23 April 2025. https://www.orica.com/en/resource-hub/news/2025/optimising-explosive-efficiency-with-oricas-4d-technologies-and-decarbonisation

[28] Dyno Nobel. “Dyno Nobel: setting a new standard for safer, smarter blasting.” 20 November 2025. https://www.dynonobel.com/news-and-media/news/dyno-nobel-setting-a-new-standard-for-safer-smarter-blasting/

[29] Farmonaut. “Mining Commercial, Mine & Mines Explosives: 7 Safety Tips.” 2025. https://farmonaut.com/mining/mining-commercial-mine-mines-explosives-7-safety-tips

Academic, conference and technical literature

[30] Kuykendall, S. T. Characterization of Explosives Testing Ranges: Environmental Impacts and Remediation Considerations. PhD dissertation, Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Selinus University, 2023.

[31] Eriksson, J. and Lagerström, T. “World’s first lead-free non-electric detonator range, Exel™ Neo.” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference and Exhibition on Mass Mining (MassMin 2024), Kiruna, Sweden, 17–19 September 2024, pp. 1139–1142. DOI: 10.36487/ACG_repo/2435_I-02

[32] Morton, J. “New Explosives System Offers Control, Optionality and Ways to Improve Production.” Engineering & Mining Journal (E&MJ), January 2022, p. 42.

[33] Buczkowski, D. and Ołowski, G. “Ammonium Nitrate – A Product with Different Properties and Different Detonation Capacity.” SSRN preprint, 2025. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5761659

[34] Kononenko, M., Khomenko, O., Kovalenko, I., Kosenko, A., Zagorodnii, R. and Dychkovskyi, R. “Determining the performance of explosives for blasting management.” Rudarsko-geološko-naftni zbornik, 38(3), 2023, pp. 19–28. DOI: 10.17794/rgn.2023.3.2

[35] Kononenko, M., Khomenko, O., Myronova, I. and Kovalenko, I. “Economic and environmental aspects of using mining equipment and emulsion explosives for ore mining.” Mining Machines, 40(2), 2022, pp. 88–97. DOI: 10.32056/KOMAG2022.2.4

[36] Ravikumar, A., Vardhan, H., Shankar, M. U. and Pandey, R. “Digital and AI-based evaluation of ANFO and SME explosives in surface coal mining: fragmentation, powder factor, ground vibrations, sustainability implications and safety outcomes.” Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 73:33, 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s44147-026-00898-8

[37] Jesionek, B. and Massabki, R. “Unlocking potential of the Gold Fields St Ives Gold Mine using wireless blasting technology.” Proceedings of the Underground Operators Conference 2025, Adelaide, Australia, 7–9 April 2025, pp. 485–492.